AMPHITHEATER PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Tucson, Arizona

 

MINUTES OF SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BOARD

 

Place, Date and Time of Meeting    

Wetmore Center, 701 West Wetmore Road, May 28, 2002, 3:30 p.m.

 

Board Members Present

Dr. Kenneth Smith, President

Mary Schuh, Vice President/Clerk

Dr. Kent Barrabee, Member

Mike Prout, Member (present for open meeting following executive session)

Nancy Young Wright, Member

 

Central Administrators Present           

Dr. Vicki M. Balentine, Superintendent

Dr. Richard Hooley, Associate Superintendent

Todd A. Jaeger, J.D., Associate to Superintendent and General Counsel

OPENING OF MEETING

Call to Order 

Dr. Kenneth Smith called the meeting to order.

 

Pledge of Allegiance      

Dr. Balentine led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

 

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no public comments.

EXECUTIVE SESSION

1.  Motion to Recess Open Meeting and Hold an Executive Session

Dr. Smith announced that the Board would recess open meeting and hold an executive session for the following purposes: 

A.         Consideration and Determination of Appeal of Long-term Suspension Hearing Officer’s Decision, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(A);

B.         Determination of Whether to Hold an Expulsion Hearing and Designate a Hearing Officer to Hear Evidence, Prepare a Record and Bring a Recommendation to the Board, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(F)(2);

C.         Determination of Whether to Hold an Expulsion Hearing and Designate a Hearing Officer to Hear Evidence, Prepare a Record and Bring a Recommendation to the Board, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(F)(2);

D.         Determination of Whether to Hold an Expulsion Hearing and Designate a Hearing Officer to Hear Evidence, Prepare a Record and Bring a Recommendation to the Board, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(F)(2);

E.         Determination of Whether to Hold an Expulsion Hearing and Designate a Hearing Officer to Hear Evidence, Prepare a Record and Bring a Recommendation to the Board, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(F)(2);

F.         Determination of Whether to Hold an Expulsion Hearing and Designate a Hearing Officer to Hear Evidence, Prepare a Record and Bring a Recommendation to the Board, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(F)(2); Determination of Whether to Hold an Expulsion Hearing and Designate a Hearing Officer to Hear Evidence, Prepare a Record and Bring a Recommendation to the Board, Pursuant to A.R.S. §15-843(F)(2).

A motion was made by Mrs. Schuh, seconded by Dr. Barrabee and passed unanimously, that the Board recess into executive session.  The time was 3:32 p.m.

 

RECONVENING OF OPEN MEETING

Reconvening of Meeting and Signing of Visitors Register

Following the executive session, Dr. Smith reconvened the meeting at 5:03 p.m.

 

STUDY/ACTION

2.  Review of 2002-2003 Governing Board Meeting Dates
There was no discussion of the 2002-2003 Governing Board meeting dates.

 

3.  Election of Delegate to Arizona School Boards Delegate Assembly
Mrs. Schuh nominated Nancy Young Wright as delegate to the Arizona School Boards Association 2002 Delegate Assembly, to be held June 29, 2002.  Ms. Young Wright nominated Mary Schuh as alternate.  Ms. Young Wright and Mrs. Schuh were elected by acclamation.   

 

Following a recess from 5:15 to 5:25 p.m., the meeting was reconvened in the East Conference Room. 

 

STUDY SESSION
4.  Discussion of Issues Affecting District Operational Efficiencies, Including But Not limited to:

Board book information:  As Governing Board President Dr. Ken Smith has frequently advised in his Legislative Updates, the Arizona Legislature is continuing to pursue a course of drastic underfunding of public education in this state.  For Amphitheater District, this will result in the reality of cuts in funding:  a loss of $2,048,731 in building renewal funds next year and a loss of $80,928 in utilities funding next year, and $168,735 more the following year.  It also means the previously discussed fact that the only increase in maintenance and operations funding which the District will receive next fiscal year will be the meager and capped 2% inflationary factor (approximately $1 million) provided by Proposition 301.

In a District the size of Amphitheater, with more than 16,000 students and 2,200 employees, $1 million can provide no means of expanding the District budget at a level which keeps pace with demand and need for expansion of programs and services.

These financial realities and their impacts upon employee compensation, programs and services necessitate the examination of District operations for determination of potential modifications which improve efficiency of the District, allowing for savings that might be recovered and redirected to existing needs of the District.  Just a few possible considerations are briefly described below to facilitate discussion. 

 

A.  Current Two School Calendar System and Consolidation

Board book information:  The District currently operates schools on two different calendars (traditional and modified), and has for the past several years.  Nationally, public schools are increasingly moving away from modified or “year-round calendars.”  Educational research evidences no positive impact upon student achievement from modified calendars.  High schools, due to interscholastic and other factors applicable to the student age group served generally, do not operate on a modified calendar, and of course, Amphitheater District does not have a high school on a modified calendar.

Operation of the schools within one district on two different calendars does have fiscal and efficiency impacts.  Additional buses are required; intersession programs are required; utility usage is higher; coordination of facilities maintenance efforts is affected.  Progress or location in standards-based curriculum varies across the District.  Impacts on time-sensitive evaluation and assessment schedules are experienced.   Customer service varies as some facilities close while others remain open.  These factors and others suggest a review of our bifurcated calendar system for potential modifications that could improve District efficiencies and reduce costs.

 

Dr. Smith provided a history of District traditional/modified calendars that have been followed in recent years.  Discussion included the advantages/disadvantages of the various calendars, the costs of running two calendars, and practices of other districts.  The Board directed Dr. Balentine to bring this matter to the Board for review in August or September.

 

B.  Student Transportation Issues

Board book information:  The District presently provides bus service for distances shorter than those funded by the State of Arizona.  Because of the District’s unique combination of topographic and urban traffic issues, the higher level of transportation service may be a necessity.  But other transportation considerations may present some opportunity for improving the efficiency of District operations.  Possibilities include reduction or consolidation of special trips; consolidation of routes resulting from a single school calendar system; coordinated vehicle maintenance schedules resulting from a consolidated school calendar; or a reduction in the number of buses required to be purchased or leased.  These are but a few potential issues to consider with respect to transportation costs.

 

Efficiencies/costs of transportation were discussed. 

 

A dinner recess was taken from 6:15 to 6:49 p.m.

 

C.  Meet and Confer Process

Board book information:  The current meet and confer process uses an interest-based bargaining approach.  There is one point of view that this form of process is more time consuming than other options.   Another view would be that other processes could take more time because there is less identification of shared interests.  All parties to this year’s and last year’s process generally agreed that a great amount of staff time was taken by negotiations, resulting in extensive time away from normal job duties and, in some cases, costs for substitute coverage.

District policies relating to the meet and confer process for all employee groups are attached, including HDA (applicable to the administrative group), which is outdated and no longer relevant, given the disbanding of the Amphitheater Leadership Association.  Also included is GCU, relating to membership of certificated personnel in professional organizations and released time for the AEA president.

 

Discussion included the efficiency and productiveness of the current meet and confer process.   Suggestions were made to improve the model by compressing the time frame, imposing deadlines.  Further input will be sought from staff and the Amphitheater Education Association.

 

Dr. Smith discussed the impact of negative communication between various parties in the District.  Mr. Lewandowski pledged to make a commitment and use his influence to eliminate these negative interactions. 

 

D.  Utilities Use and Conservation

Board book information:  With State cuts in District utilities funding over the next several years, the need for greater efficiency in utilities use becomes more urgent.  A specific agenda item concerning conservation will be presented at the June 11 Governing Board meeting.  This discussion will allow the Board to provide direction or questions that might aid in the development of the June 11 item.

 

Staff will incorporate energy-saving proposals in a report at the June 11 Board meeting.

 

E.  Summer Use and Maintenance of Facilities

Board book information:  School districts traditionally rely upon the “down” summer months to make or conduct necessary improvements, maintenance or repairs to their facilities.  Frequently, however, summer use of school facilities can interfere with these efforts, sometimes delaying or even canceling maintenance plans.  Coordination or limitation of summer uses might improve district efficiencies in the completion of facilities projects on a more timely, regular and cost-effective basis.  Utilities savings might also be achieved.  These issues are identified to facilitate discussion and Board guidance.  The administration is not making any specific recommendations at this time other than that these issues be studied and assessed further, together with others that may be suggested.

 

There was discussion of the summer schedule for closings for maintenance, and the coordination of summer programs.  

 

 

BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

There were no requests for future agenda items. 

 

 

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no public comments.

 

ADJOURNMENT

A motion was made by Mrs. Schuh, seconded by Dr. Barrabee and passed unanimously, that the meeting be adjourned.  The time was 9:53 p.m.